From 5adc7baf24969f689bcb6ab902e36ac255c81eed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Quentin Dufour Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 09:15:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] describe plots --- content/blog/2024-ram-usage-encryption-s3/index.md | 7 +++++++ templates/index.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/blog/2024-ram-usage-encryption-s3/index.md b/content/blog/2024-ram-usage-encryption-s3/index.md index 8768eb1..83cf029 100644 --- a/content/blog/2024-ram-usage-encryption-s3/index.md +++ b/content/blog/2024-ram-usage-encryption-s3/index.md @@ -332,8 +332,15 @@ The conclusion is similar to FETCH: while these commands are OK to be slow, it's ### Listing mailboxes +Another object that can be queried in IMAP are mailboxes, through the LIST command. +The test consists of 1) LOGIN, 2) LIST, and 3) LOGOUT done on a user account with 5 mailboxes. + ![List mailboxes](list.png) +There are only 2 spikes (LOGIN and LOGOUT), as the mailbox list is loaded eagerly when the user connects. +Because it's a small datastructure, it's quick to parse it, which explains why there is no CPU/memory spike +for the LIST command in itself. + --- ## Discussion diff --git a/templates/index.html b/templates/index.html index 39a78d7..c09c918 100755 --- a/templates/index.html +++ b/templates/index.html @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@

- Read our related work analysis + Read our related work analysis