forked from Deuxfleurs/garage
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feature/mdbook'
This commit is contained in:
commit
e26cb2640d
2 changed files with 33 additions and 32 deletions
|
@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ For our example, we will suppose the following infrastructure:
|
|||
|----------|---------|------------|------------|
|
||||
| Paris | Mercury | fc00:1::1 | 1 To |
|
||||
| Paris | Venus | fc00:1::2 | 2 To |
|
||||
| London | Earth | fc00:1::2 | 2 To |
|
||||
| Brussels | Mars | fc00:B::1 | 1.5 To |
|
||||
| London | Earth | fc00:B::1 | 2 To |
|
||||
| Brussels | Mars | fc00:F::1 | 1.5 To |
|
||||
|
||||
On each machine, we will have a similar setup, especially you must consider the following folders/files:
|
||||
- `/etc/garage/pki`: Garage certificates, must be generated on your computer and copied on the servers
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -9,58 +9,59 @@
|
|||
Garage is a lightweight geo-distributed data store.
|
||||
It comes from the observation that despite numerous object stores
|
||||
many people have broken data management policies (backup/replication on a single site or none at all).
|
||||
To promote better data management policies, with focused on the following desirable properties:
|
||||
To promote better data management policies, we focused on the following **desirable properties**:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-contained & lightweight**: works everywhere and integrates well in existing environments to target hyperconverged infrastructures
|
||||
- **Highly resilient**: highly resilient to network failures, network latency, disk failures, sysadmin failures
|
||||
- **Simple**: simple to understand, simple to operate, simple to debug
|
||||
- **Internet enabled**: made for multi-sites (eg. datacenter, offices, etc.) interconnected through a regular internet connection.
|
||||
- **Self-contained & lightweight**: works everywhere and integrates well in existing environments to target [hyperconverged infrastructures](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper-converged_infrastructure).
|
||||
- **Highly resilient**: highly resilient to network failures, network latency, disk failures, sysadmin failures.
|
||||
- **Simple**: simple to understand, simple to operate, simple to debug.
|
||||
- **Internet enabled**: made for multi-sites (eg. datacenters, offices, households, etc.) interconnected through regular Internet connections.
|
||||
|
||||
We also noted that the pursuit of some other goals are detrimental to our initial goals.
|
||||
The following have been identified has non-goals, if it matters to you, you should not use Garage:
|
||||
The following has been identified has **non-goals** (if these points matter to you, you should not use Garage):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Extreme performances**: high performances constrain a lot the design and the infrastructure; we seek performances through minimalism only.
|
||||
- **Feature extensiveness**: complete implementation of the S3 API or any other API to make garage a drop-in replacement is not targeted as it could lead to decisions impacting our desirable properties.
|
||||
- **Storage optimizations**: erasure coding or any other coding technique both increase the difficulty of placing data and synchronizing; we limit ourselves to duplication.
|
||||
- **POSIX/Filesystem compatibility**: we do not aim at being POSIX compatible or to emulate any kind of filesystem. Indeed, in a distributed environment, such syncronizations are translated in network messages that impose severe constraints on the deployment.
|
||||
- **POSIX/Filesystem compatibility**: we do not aim at being POSIX compatible or to emulate any kind of filesystem. Indeed, in a distributed environment, such synchronizations are translated in network messages that impose severe constraints on the deployment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Supported and planned protocols
|
||||
|
||||
Garage speaks (or will speak) the following protocols:
|
||||
|
||||
- [S3](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/Welcome.html) - *SUPPORTED* - Enable applications to store large blobs such as pictures, video, images, documents, etc. S3 is versatile enough to also be used to publish a static website.
|
||||
- [IMAP](https://github.com/go-pluto/pluto) - *PLANNED* - email storage is quite complex to get good oerformances.
|
||||
To keep performances optimals, most imap servers only support on-disk storage.
|
||||
- [IMAP](https://github.com/go-pluto/pluto) - *PLANNED* - email storage is quite complex to get good performances.
|
||||
To keep performances optimal, most IMAP servers only support on-disk storage.
|
||||
We plan to add logic to Garage to make it a viable solution for email storage.
|
||||
- *More to come*
|
||||
|
||||
## Use Cases
|
||||
|
||||
**[Deuxfleurs](https://deuxfleurs.fr) :** Garage is used by Deuxfleurs which is a non-profit hosting organization.
|
||||
Especially, it is used to host their main website, this documentation and some of its members's blogs. Additionally,
|
||||
Garage is used as a [backend for Nextcloud](https://docs.nextcloud.com/server/20/admin_manual/configuration_files/primary_storage.html). Deuxfleurs also plans to use Garage as their [Matrix's media backend](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse-s3-storage-provider) and has the backend of [OCIS](https://github.com/owncloud/ocis).
|
||||
Especially, it is used to host their main website, this documentation and some of its members' blogs.
|
||||
Additionally, Garage is used as a [backend for Nextcloud](https://docs.nextcloud.com/server/20/admin_manual/configuration_files/primary_storage.html).
|
||||
Deuxfleurs also plans to use Garage as their [Matrix's media backend](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse-s3-storage-provider) and as the backend of [OCIS](https://github.com/owncloud/ocis).
|
||||
|
||||
*Are you using Garage? [Open a pull request](https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/garage/) to add your organization here!*
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison to existing software
|
||||
|
||||
**[Minio](https://min.io/) :** Minio shares our *self-contained & lightweight* goal but selected two of our non-goals: *storage optimizations* through erasure coding and *POSIX/Filesystem compatibility* through strong consistency.
|
||||
However, by pursuing these two non-goals, minio do not reach our desirable properties.
|
||||
First, it fails on the *simple* property: due to the erasure coding, minio has severe limitations on how drives can be added or deleted from a cluster.
|
||||
Second, it fails on the *interned enabled* property: due to its strong consistency, minio is latency sensitive.
|
||||
Furthermore, minio has no knowledge of "sites" and thus can not distribute data to minimize the failure of a given site.
|
||||
**[MinIO](https://min.io/):** MinIO shares our *Self-contained & lightweight* goal but selected two of our non-goals: *Storage optimizations* through erasure coding and *POSIX/Filesystem compatibility* through strong consistency.
|
||||
However, by pursuing these two non-goals, MinIO do not reach our desirable properties.
|
||||
Firstly, it fails on the *Simple* property: due to the erasure coding, MinIO has severe limitations on how drives can be added or deleted from a cluster.
|
||||
Secondly, it fails on the *Internet enabled* property: due to its strong consistency, MinIO is latency sensitive.
|
||||
Furthermore, MinIO has no knowledge of "sites" and thus can not distribute data to minimize the failure of a given site.
|
||||
|
||||
**[Openstack Swift](https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/):**
|
||||
OpenStack Swift at least fails on the *self-contained & lightweight* goal.
|
||||
Starting it requires around 8Gb of RAM, which is too much especially in an hyperconverged infrastructure.
|
||||
It seems also to be far from *Simple*.
|
||||
OpenStack Swift at least fails on the *Self-contained & lightweight* goal.
|
||||
Starting it requires around 8GB of RAM, which is too much especially in an hyperconverged infrastructure.
|
||||
We also do not classify Swift as *Simple*.
|
||||
|
||||
**[Ceph](https://ceph.io/ceph-storage/object-storage/):**
|
||||
This review holds for the whole Ceph stack, including the RADOS paper, Ceph Object Storage module, the RADOS Gateway, etc.
|
||||
At is core, Ceph has been designed to provide *POSIX/Filesystem compatibility* which requires strong consistency, which in turn
|
||||
makes Ceph latency sensitive and fails our *Internet enabled* goal.
|
||||
Due to its industry oriented design, Ceph is also far from being *Simple* to operate and from being *self-contained & lightweight* which makes it hard to integrate it in an hyperconverged infrastructure.
|
||||
In a certain way, Ceph and Minio are closer togethers than they are from Garage or OpenStack Swift.
|
||||
At its core, Ceph has been designed to provide *POSIX/Filesystem compatibility* which requires strong consistency, which in turn
|
||||
makes Ceph latency-sensitive and fails our *Internet enabled* goal.
|
||||
Due to its industry oriented design, Ceph is also far from being *Simple* to operate and from being *Self-contained & lightweight* which makes it hard to integrate it in an hyperconverged infrastructure.
|
||||
In a certain way, Ceph and MinIO are closer together than they are from Garage or OpenStack Swift.
|
||||
|
||||
*More comparisons are available in our [Related Work](design/related_work.md) chapter.*
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -71,29 +72,29 @@ We reference here other places on the Internet where you can learn more about Ga
|
|||
|
||||
### Rust API (docs.rs)
|
||||
|
||||
If you encounter a specific bug in Garage or plan to patch it, you may jump directly to the source code documentation!
|
||||
If you encounter a specific bug in Garage or plan to patch it, you may jump directly to the source code's documentation!
|
||||
|
||||
- [garage\_api](https://docs.rs/garage_api/latest/garage_api/) - contains the S3 standard API endpoint
|
||||
- [garage\_model](https://docs.rs/garage_model/latest/garage_model/) - contains Garage's model built on the table abstraction
|
||||
- [garage\_rpc](https://docs.rs/garage_rpc/latest/garage_rpc/) - contains Garage's federation protocol
|
||||
- [garage\_table](https://docs.rs/garage_table/latest/garage_table/) - contains core Garage's CRDT datatypes
|
||||
- [garage\_util](https://docs.rs/garage_util/latest/garage_util/) - contains garage entrypoints (daemon, cli)
|
||||
- [garage\_util](https://docs.rs/garage_util/latest/garage_util/) - contains garage helpers
|
||||
- [garage\_web](https://docs.rs/garage_web/latest/garage_web/) - contains the S3 website endpoint
|
||||
|
||||
### Talks
|
||||
|
||||
We love to talk and hear about Garage, that's why we keep a log here:
|
||||
|
||||
- [(fr, 2020-12-02) Garage : jouer dans la cour des grands quand on est un hébergeur associatif](https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/garage/src/branch/master/doc/20201202_talk/talk.pdf)
|
||||
- [(fr, 2020-12-02) Garage : jouer dans la cour des grands quand on est un hébergeur associatif](https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/garage/src/branch/main/doc/20201202_talk/talk.pdf)
|
||||
|
||||
*Did you write or talk about Garage? [Open a pull request](https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/garage/) to add a link here!*
|
||||
|
||||
## Community
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to discuss with us, you can join our Matrix channel at [#garage:deuxfleurs.fr](https://matrix.to/#/#garage:deuxfleurs.fr).
|
||||
Our code and our issue tracker, which is the place where you should report bugs, are managed on [Deuxfleurs' Gitea](https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/garage).
|
||||
Our code repository and issue tracker, which is the place where you should report bugs, is managed on [Deuxfleurs' Gitea](https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/garage).
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
Garage, all the source code, is released under the [AGPL v3 License](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html).
|
||||
Garage's source code, is released under the [AGPL v3 License](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html).
|
||||
Please note that if you patch Garage and then use it to provide any service over a network, you must share your code!
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue