Add a note about Peertube 5.0 private videos
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing

This commit is contained in:
kaiyou 2022-12-25 14:20:01 +01:00
parent 1af4a5ed56
commit fd10200bec

View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ In this section, we cover the following web applications:
| Name | Status | Note |
|------|--------|------|
| [Nextcloud](#nextcloud) | ✅ | Both Primary Storage and External Storage are supported |
| [Peertube](#peertube) | ✅ | Must be configured with the website endpoint |
| [Peertube](#peertube) | ✅ | Supported with the website endpoint, proxifying private videos unsupported |
| [Mastodon](#mastodon) | ✅ | Natively supported |
| [Matrix](#matrix) | ✅ | Tested with `synapse-s3-storage-provider` |
| [Pixelfed](#pixelfed) | ❓ | Not yet tested |
@ -128,6 +128,10 @@ In other words, Peertube is only responsible of the "control plane" and offload
In return, this system is a bit harder to configure.
We show how it is still possible to configure Garage with Peertube, allowing you to spread the load and the bandwidth usage on the Garage cluster.
Starting from version 5.0, Peertube also supports improving the security for private videos by not exposing them directly
but relying on a single control point in the Peertube instance. This is based on S3 per-object and prefix ACL, which are not currently supported
in Garage, so this feature is unsupported. While this technically impedes security for private videos, it is not a blocking issue and could be
a reasonable trade-off for some instances.
### Create resources in Garage
@ -195,6 +199,11 @@ object_storage:
max_upload_part: 2GB
proxy:
# You may enable this feature, yet it will not provide any security benefit, so
# you should rather benefit from Garage public endpoint for all videos
proxify_private_files: false
streaming_playlists:
bucket_name: 'peertube-playlist'