helm: ingress improvements #422
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
AdminAPI
Bug
Check AWS
CI
Correctness
Critical
Documentation
Ideas
Improvement
Low priority
Newcomer
Performance
S3 Compatibility
Testing
Usability
No Milestone
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Deuxfleurs/garage#422
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "patrickjahns/garage:helm-refactor-ingress"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
As discussed in the chat yesterday, I want to propose to disable the ingress per default.
The motivation behind this change is, that per default the ingress is "misconfigured" meaning it can not work with the default values and requires a user of the chart to add additional configuration. When installing the chart per default, I would not expect to already expose garage publicly without my explicit configuration to do so
Commenting the
ingressClass
resource also allows for relying only on annotations - otherwise the ingressClass would be always set to nginx or require a user to override it withingressClass: null
A small change on top, I've added the ability to specify user defined labels per ingress
@maximilien can you review this?
This compiles properly and should deploy fine although I did not run end to end tests.
I agree those changes are welcome, especially diabling the default ingress class, which inteferes with many setups.
Sorry @patrickjahns I had to 'manually' merge this PR because I tried to rebase it though the interface and Gitea got itself stuck on the rebase hook, because of a somewhat cryptic incompatibility issue between musl/alpine and docker (see here the notes about
faccessat2
). The commits retained your name, but the end result ended up under mine. Please acccepts my appologies for that, next time I'll remember to useCo-authored-by:
...Pull request closed