Performance question #900
Labels
No labels
action
check-aws
action
discussion-needed
action
for-external-contributors
action
for-newcomers
action
more-info-needed
action
need-funding
action
triage-required
kind
correctness
kind
ideas
kind
improvement
kind
performance
kind
testing
kind
usability
kind
wrong-behavior
prio
critical
prio
low
scope
admin-api
scope
background-healing
scope
build
scope
documentation
scope
k8s
scope
layout
scope
metadata
scope
ops
scope
rpc
scope
s3-api
scope
security
scope
telemetry
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Deuxfleurs/garage#900
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
hi
i installed garage in mono hosts, everything is async,
the hosts 250gb of memory 16 cores,
20 disks in raid 10, 10gb link.
Using s5cm i get about 100MB/s while copying to /tmp (memory fs),
using the same setup i get more like 800MB/s using minio
And when uploading its at 100MB/s and after sometime get down to 50MB/s
and seems limited by disk usage that seems very high (lot of small ios ?).
Not sure what's going on, i don't see a lot of space to tweak the settings,
and even when its at 100MB/s i can't see what the bottelneck is,
i thought maybe latency but i also tried in local and had the same results.
Garage was not tuned for high performance on such high-end systems, so it's normal that it would perform poorly compared to minio. Garage is tuned for low request latency in geodistributed clusters.
It would be interesting to see what is the bottleneck in your setup, I suspect it's CPU ?
You can try changing the
block_size
configuration parameter to see if it changes something for you, for example set it to10M
or more.