Deuxfleurs/garage
44
56
Fork 73
Code Issues 100 Pull requests 14 Releases 30 Wiki Activity

Doc: add funding disclaimer for NGI/EU grant #112

Merged
quentin merged 3 commits from feature/doc-add-ngi-funding into main 2021-10-04 14:40:45 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 3 Files changed 4 +21 -1
4 changed files with 21 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
Makefile
View file

@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
.PHONY: doc
all: all:
clear; cargo build clear; cargo build
doc:
cd doc/book; mdbook build
release: release:
RUSTFLAGS="-C link-arg=-fuse-ld=lld -C target-cpu=x86-64 -C target-feature=+sse2" cargo build --release --no-default-features RUSTFLAGS="-C link-arg=-fuse-ld=lld -C target-cpu=x86-64 -C target-feature=+sse2" cargo build --release --no-default-features

BIN
doc/book/src/img/eu-flag-logo.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.4 KiB

BIN
doc/book/src/img/ngi-logo.png Normal file
View file

Binary file not shown.
Side by side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 34 KiB

17
doc/book/src/intro.md
View file

@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ We also do not classify Swift as *Simple*.
**[Ceph](https://ceph.io/ceph-storage/object-storage/):** **[Ceph](https://ceph.io/ceph-storage/object-storage/):**
This review holds for the whole Ceph stack, including the RADOS paper, Ceph Object Storage module, the RADOS Gateway, etc. This review holds for the whole Ceph stack, including the RADOS paper, Ceph Object Storage module, the RADOS Gateway, etc.
At its core, Ceph has been designed to provide *POSIX/Filesystem compatibility* which requires strong consistency, which in turn At its core, Ceph has been designed to provide *POSIX/Filesystem compatibility* which requires strong consistency, which in turn
makes Ceph latency-sensitive and fails our *Internet enabled* goal. makes Ceph latency-sensitive and fails our *Internet enabled* goal.
Due to its industry oriented design, Ceph is also far from being *Simple* to operate and from being *Self-contained & lightweight* which makes it hard to integrate it in an hyperconverged infrastructure. Due to its industry oriented design, Ceph is also far from being *Simple* to operate and from being *Self-contained & lightweight* which makes it hard to integrate it in an hyperconverged infrastructure.
In a certain way, Ceph and MinIO are closer together than they are from Garage or OpenStack Swift. In a certain way, Ceph and MinIO are closer together than they are from Garage or OpenStack Swift.
@ -111,3 +111,18 @@ Our code repository and issue tracker, which is the place where you should repor
Garage's source code, is released under the [AGPL v3 License](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html). Garage's source code, is released under the [AGPL v3 License](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html).
Please note that if you patch Garage and then use it to provide any service over a network, you must share your code! Please note that if you patch Garage and then use it to provide any service over a network, you must share your code!
# Funding
The Deuxfleurs association has received a grant promise to fund 3 people working on Garage for a year, from October 2021 to September 2022.
<div style="display: flex; justify-content: space-around">
<a href="https://pointer.ngi.eu/">
<img style="height:100px" src="img/ngi-logo.png" alt="NGI Pointer logo">
</a>
<a href="https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/what-horizon-2020">
<img style="height:100px" src="img/eu-flag-logo.png" alt="EU flag logo">
</a>
</div>
_This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme within the framework of the NGI-POINTER Project funded under grant agreement No 871528._