WIP: Specify K2V with Smithy #538

Closed
quentin wants to merge 2 commits from smithy2 into main
Owner

As I want to create libraries for multiple languages, and because I think it's nice to clearly specify an API, I want to specify K2V API in an Interface Description Language. For multiple reasons, I am not very convinced by OpenAPI, so I am trying this time with Smithy.

As I want to create libraries for multiple languages, and because I think it's nice to clearly specify an API, I want to specify K2V API in an Interface Description Language. For multiple reasons, I am not very convinced by OpenAPI, so I am trying this time with Smithy.
quentin added 2 commits 2023-04-10 16:44:10 +00:00
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing Details
0fbc9bbb05
wip smithy
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing Details
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing Details
4d6c0500cb
first build of the model
Owner

@quentin is this PR still relevant?

@quentin is this PR still relevant?
Author
Owner

You can close it for now, but I would like to keep the branch. In other words, yes, I think it's still relevant to specify our API with Smithy, no I don't have time to work on it now.

You can close it for now, but I would like to keep the branch. In other words, yes, I think it's still relevant to specify our API with Smithy, no I don't have time to work on it now.
lx closed this pull request 2023-08-28 09:38:27 +00:00
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
continuous-integration/drone/pr Build is passing
Required
Details

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.